

- #Weird characters at sign in for chrome mac software#
- #Weird characters at sign in for chrome mac code#
- #Weird characters at sign in for chrome mac windows#
#Weird characters at sign in for chrome mac software#
On another note, there are several other software packages that include version history tables including Firefox, Safari, and Others. Maybe this table should only show a history of the Stable channel and the most recent Beta & Dev releases. I agree with Sc0ttkclark & FatalError that because there tend to be a lot of releases of Chrome (especially in the Beta & Dev release channels) we shouldn't list them all. Fatal Error 01:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC) I vote to bring this table back. Sc0ttkclark ( talk) 13:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Awesome, looks good. Fatal Error 07:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC) I have to agree with you FatalError, I've removed this table from the article and renamed the section title from "Version History" to "Stable, Beta, and Dev Releases". You don't see this kind of table in any other software article, and it makes even less sense for Chrome, because there are hardly any differences between the versions (not to mention.just look at the version numbers).

Sc0ttkclark ( talk) 14:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC) I'd personally go another step further and say just delete the entire thing, but if anything, have it like above. Does anyone disagree with me in that we need to list EVERY version on this page? It seems way too redundant to track Beta and Public releases of this thing if we're not tracking it on other software. If they want to see a complete version history, they can always click on the reference link in the text section of this area. This makes the chart much easier to manage. Gordon Ecker ( talk) 04:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC) I have to revisit this, I think this should be the new version history chart because we shouldn't be tracking each release of Google Chrome here, only major x.x versions, or x.0 versions. We can trim off most of the bete releases once the table gets too large. Sc0ttkclark ( talk) 23:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC) IMO the number beta and stable releases is short enough to include all of them in the table for now. If it does stay then it should just show when it was released to beta, and then the stable versions released here-in. not really a need for it to be here and it'll just get long. X S G 04:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Wouldn't the reference from the Official Google Chrome Release blog count towards something? I agree about the version history though. I'd like to discuss before I just go and delete it, however. The Version History section, particularly the chart of releases, rings of WP:OR and doesn't seem to belong in Wikipedia. Gordon Ecker ( talk) 08:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Version History

I've re-added the frequently updated parameter, IMO Chrome is updated frequently enough to warrent its' use.
#Weird characters at sign in for chrome mac windows#
109 HTML5test as of Google Chrome 45 and Windows 10.106 Add 64-bit ARM64/ARMv8-A to Chrom ?.104 Add Encrypted Media Extensions addition to change list.102 Can't see changes in Chrome Release History.

#Weird characters at sign in for chrome mac code#
